Volvo speeds up driverless car project

Look, no handsVolvo’s test of self-driving cars seems to be progressing significantly ahead of schedule.  In a press release last December, the company said that “the project would commence in 2014 with customer research and technology development, [with the first cars] expected to be on the roads in Gothenburg by 2017.”  An update just released says that “the first test cars are already rolling around the Swedish city of Gothenburg and the sophisticated Autopilot technology is performing well.”

Why the rush into self-driving cars, and what will be the consequences – intended and otherwise?

One big reason for introducing self-driving cars is safety.  Human beings cause a million road deaths every year, and computers are less prone to error – partly because they don’t get drunk, tired or angry.  Driverless cars can also move together in synchronised “herds”, which dramatically speeds up journey times.

Some observers expect that commuting distances may increase, and commuting may become much less of a bore, as drivers read, watch movies, and catch up with emails (and blog posts) while their automatic pilots take care of the driving duties.

A lot has been made of the potential for job losses as driving jobs are automated, but most of this is overdone.  Until and unless computers become conscious and pass the Turing Test, humans will be needed on board taxis, vans and trucks – partly to load and unload their cargoes, and partly to deal with the unexpected developments that the real world throws up on many journeys.  Evidence for this is provided by the aviation industry.  Planes have been flown “by wire” for decades, but we still don’t have pilot-less passenger or cargo planes.

3 thoughts on “Volvo speeds up driverless car project

  1. Interesting. And interesting that a brand with credentials based on safety (albeit credentials that are now slightly ancient and less market-leading) should champion this. I have a Volvo by accident. Four years ago, I woke up sensible one day, and made a rash purchase in a fit of economic rationality. As said Volvo won’t break down, and is in immaculate condition, I may be stuck with it for another 4 years. I’d be very happy not to drive it. If I had a BMW M3 or an Audi R8, on the other hand…

  2. Like your last point – hadn’t thought of that. We have Google driverless cars all around us here in the Bay Area – and they have a 100% safety record thus far – unlike humans – who also like to text while they drive (as long as drink, get tired, etc!)

    • Lucky you, living in the crucible of the future! The only downside about the Bay Area is that all the great architecture is where the good weather isn’t!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s